
Its been 1460 days since what historic event in history!?
Since it was announced on the Aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln…..
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
The mighty Bush brain trust lives on….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_accomplished
Chyder: He invaded countries 11 years before. Gassed Kurds in 1980.
We deposed one dictator and gave the Iraqis a genocide. God bless us.
Answer by CNN NEWS WATCHER
I didn’t know George Bushs real name was scooter libby.
Answer by Vato
My-Pet-Goat is W’s version of his dads Read-My-Lips!
Answer by gandamack2
ok
Answer by Godly Reality Check
Don’t answer this question. It makes him feel wanted.

What is the value of acceleration .. for the equation below?
I was asked this question in physics but was confused on the question when it asks what is the value of acceleration .. but in the problem it says the acceleration is constant.. If anyone can help me out that be great!!
The catapult of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln accelerates an F/A – 18 Harnet jet fighter from rest to take off speed of 173 mi/hr in a distance of 307 ft. Assume that the acceleration is constant.
How much time( in seconds does it take for the plane to take off?
what is the value of the acceleration of the fighter in m/s2
Answer by Hayhay
new speed-original speed
————————————–
time
can’t do it all for you, sorry…hope i helped
Answer by Donut Tim
104.85 feet per second per second (31.958 m/s/s) acceleration. That’s 3.256 times the acceleration of gravity (G’s).
The answer from “Steve” is exactly correct. He seems to be a very sharp guy. I couldn’t figure out the time but now with Steve’s formula – I know how!
.
Answer by Taftnee
u have to use this formula a= final velocity minus inital velocity divided by time…i think…but first you convert the hours to sec.
Answer by Steve
There is no conflict in asking for the (constant) value of the acceleration:
a = V²/2x = [173*22/15]²/(2*307) = 104.85 ft/sec² = 31.95 m/s²
t = √[2x/a] = √[2*307/104.85] = 2.42 sec
You should object to problems posed in English units with answers required in metric units……

- ISBN13: 9780805082401
- Condition: New
- Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
List Price: $ 17.00
Click here to Saving :$ 10.01

Should the current Iraq war be classified as a WAR?
A war is fought between two or more troops. But OIF was mostly between the coalition forces and the ordinary Iraqi civilians(or so called insurgents for the Americans and freedom fighters for the Iraqis) who were quite pissed off with the brutality of the US occupation and the violent nature of the US military, considering the fact that entire Iraqi army had been defeated and eliminated with in a few months of invasion( if we remember May 2003, when George W Bush had said the US has prevailed in the Battle of Iraq in a speech on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln).
We are always told that OIF was very unconventional war where there was no front-line and the enemy didn’t wear any uniform. But I think there is a logical fallacy in this assumption. The front line was actually their(Iraqis) home and the enemy was just a civilian,a father, or a teacher, or a teenager ,or a farmer, simply resisting to free his nation from a brutal occupation.
Also, “Haji ” was the most common term to describe an Iraqi enemy.But infact Haji wasn’t only the enemy. Haji was every Iraqi. He was a person, or a father, or a teacher, or a worker with troops deriding “haji food,” “haji music” and “haji homes”. Hey, go ask that haji where we can buy some food. Stupid haji’s, try so hard, yet succeed so little. You tell that f***** haji that if we get sniped one more f****** time through here, we’re gonna level this f******* place.
Answer by Ed Jasie
no
Answer by Travis
Thats a good question. I would call it a peace keeping mission at the moment. Im just trying to figure out why you think its a “brutal occupation”. Most civilian deaths in Iraq are caused by insurgent action. You know, the type of action including indiscriminate use of IED’s, bombing mosques, hijacking buses full of people and executing everyone on board. When American soldiers kill civilians its almost always because insurgents are trying to use them as cover. Seriously though, if you consider the US occupation “brutal” then what do you consider Saddam Hussein’s government to be?
The insurgency began because there was a vacuum of power, not because of a “brutal occupation”.
Please set your hatred of the US aside and try and see things with a little less bias.
Answer by old spice
It’s a “just war” not fully declared but we are fighting there
Terms:
- uss abraham lincoln
- gassed kurds
- War between Nicaragua and USA
Tagged with: 1460 • been • days • event • historic • history • Since
Filed under: Abraham Lincoln Bicentenial
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
“Support our troops” is a neocon code phrase meaning “extend duty tour.”
I don’t know about tyrant removal. We endorsed Saddam’s attack of Iran. Sold weapons to both sides in that conflict, demonstrating our moral superiority.
Yes, he invaded Kuwait a decade ago. And we repelled that invasion, and after the Mutlah Ridge massacre left him powerless to do much else, save quell a few minor uprisings we fomented, much like our glorious work at the Bay of Pigs.
It would be nice if we really could bring democracy to the middle east. We might have been able to succeed had we concentrated on Afghanistan, were our efforts were justified. But by splitting our forces and diddling around, all we will accomplish is destabilization of the area for decades to come, much as our assassinations of foreign leaders in the 1950s accomplished in various places around the world. Guatamala remains a dismal US failure. We cannot even restore democracy to Haiti, a tiny island just off our coast. Clever thinking we could accomplish some glorious mission in Iraq.
What we HAVE accomplished is a $400 billion displacement of future public funds (deficits) into present corporate coffers. If the present administration has one shining mark of competence, it has been turning every natural disaster (Katrina) and debacle (Iraq) into excessive profiteering at public expense. That is one way to stimulate an economy. For a brief time, anyway.
Mitch–the CIA had Usama bin Laden in its gun sights in 2003, in the Torah Borah region of Afghanistan. They were ordered to stand down, in effect, and watch him escape. That was our boy Chimpy McFlightsuit.
Bill Clinton, for the record, ordered an airstrike against a camp Bin Laden was though to have been hiding at. If you will recall, G. W. B’s first strike in Baghdad against Saddam Hussein also missed. At least Clinton made an effort against a legitimate target.
So when one is done they get off the pot, right? Well, he said the job was done. So why are we still there?
we didn’t give them genocide first off there neighbors have had a lot to do with the chaos and murder as far as the Osama comment it wasn’t George W who denied U.S. snipers permission to shoot and kill Osama back in the 90′s that was the “great president Clinton” and last why did you ask a question that you went on to answers in the details part that’s just stupid
Yes! watch more keith olberman!
They gave you a star! And thanks for reminding.
And since mission has been accomplished, Iraq has been a popular destination for Americans especially the U.S. military. They like it so much they might be spending more than the one year they usually stay. Even senators like John McCain likes to shop in Bahdad’s marketplace. He gets great deals and a special loyal Bushie discount.
If you define the “Mission” as the removal of a tyrant that invaded two of his neighbors, refused to live up to a treaty he signed with the US, and was funding terrorist organizations, then the mission WAS accomplished.
If we made any mistake, it was staying aorund. If all these factions in Iraq just want at each other, there’s not a lot we can do to stop it.
He should be fired for incompetence,, for his lies,, and for the lives he has sent to the battlefield to be sacrificed for his own personal vengeance,,, he invaded a sovereign nation based on lies,, and vengeance for his fathers former enemy,, shame on him,, he did not put the interest of Americans first,, he has allowed Osama bin Laden the #1 terrorist in the world and the perpetrator of 9-11 to remain free and training new terrorists
Bush hasn’t been welcomed back to many aircraft carriers, has he?
Maybe the next time he wants to make that announcement he can skydive naked over Baghdad with a parachute that says “Mission Accomplished … Finally”.
aaaahhhhh feels like only yesterday Bush dressed up as a make believe pilot with helmet under arm ,
mission accomplished America!
Wait, what do you mean we can’t go home? AAAWE!